Yadayada

Thursday, January 19, 2006

The Isle of Dogs

A skanky scarred fox scurries across the forlorn urban wasteland. His hungry nose on the scent trail of a dead seagull’s stench blowing on a mild icy wind. He wonders amongst the rusty rubble of old London town's docks through the thin rain, but in vain. One of his cubs will die tonight.

By 1980 the docks of London had got themselves in a sorry state. Corruption of over powerful unions; the dock's incompetent depth that drove away dismissive modern ships; the constant bombing during the Blitz; Britain’s slow and painful economic decline throughout the twentieth century had all taken their toll. The docks were dead. Its fat, bloated, rusted, corpse slowing decaying in the rain on the Isle of Dogs.

It wasn't always like this: for over 100 years London was the biggest city on the planet. By 1900 its population was reaching for 7 million, still dismissive of the young upstart New York's 3 million.

For over a century Britain had controlled the largest Empire that man had ever known. The sun never set on the Union Jack, they said. A formable and forcible feat for a small rainy island off coast the north west coast of Europe.

It was all controlled by commerce and ships - lots and lots of ships. And more ships to protect the other ships. And then some really special ships to protect those ships. Oh and shooting anyone who disagreed - but mostly ships. Did I mention the ships yet?

At one point Britain controlled 90% of global naval trade. The ports of Glasgow, Liverpool and London were bursting with exotic goods from over the world. Teeming with trader's and sailor's tales of successes. London most of all - the centre of the universe.

London's longitude is still 0, 0, 0.

But time passes, stripping away what was, as it does to everything.

Next week: From the ashes - Canary Wharf.

3 Comments:

  • ^Sounds like you to should hook up.

    Anyway, I just wanted to say that a classic case you study in 1st year law school is the case of Raffles v. Wichelhaus; where two merchants made a deal on the merchandise from a ship called, "The Peerless" coming from Bombay, and there were actually about a dozen ships named, "The Peerless."

    Ergo, contract void for "Mutual Mistake" (error in formation).

    I guess the relevance being, there were indeed a lot of ships in 1864.

    By Blogger Zen Wizard, at 11:16 pm  

  • I am Swedy, I have the feeling you work around the corner from me.

    It is true Zen, I am sure the London's docks were full of dubious legal shenanigans then as they are now.

    By Blogger h, at 2:13 am  

  • There was nothing nefarious in this case, it was just buyer meant Peerless 1 and seller meant Peerless 2.

    But you would think there could be only one, "Peerless" and there were, like, 20.

    This precedent comes up a lot in land contracts, where one guy thinks Blackacre is Plot 12 and the secretary writes, "Plot 21" or something.

    If you ever run out of Sominex, just tell me and I'll recount other "exciting" cases.

    By Blogger Zen Wizard, at 11:49 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home